JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 5, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Martha Silenia Alvarez Rodriguez Vs. Revista Cambio

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado 46 Penal Del Circuito De Bogota D. C. Y El Juzgado 3 Penal Municipal De Bogota D. C. Ordena Al Juzgado 46 Penal Del Circuito De Bogota D. C. Asumir El Conocimiento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Revista Cambio
  • Conocimiento de juez penal del circuito
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Reglas jurisprudenciales fundamentales
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Derecho De Acceso A La Administración De Justicia
  • Corte Constitucional no puede ser permisiva con la dilación de términos ni la renuencia de las autoridades
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Reglas para el trámite administrativo de reparto
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia residual para dirimir conflictos de competencia
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR al Juzgado 46 Penal del Circuito de Bogota D.C., que de forma inmediata, asuma el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia y profiera la decision de instancia que corresponda conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.